As you may have realized by my scribblings here, I approach life with a conservative, Christian perspective. If that offends you, you may leave. The first amendment allows a freedom of speech, not a freedom from offense.
Our culture has its origins in desire for freedom of religion, association, and ability to study and appropriately apply the principles of the Bible. It was reasonable for John Adams to say:

While our country remains untainted with the principles and manners which are now producing desolation in so many parts of the world; while she continues sincere, and incapable of insidious and impious policy, we shall have the strongest reason to rejoice in the local destination assigned us by Providence. But should the people of America once become capable of that deep simulation towards one another, and towards foreign nations, which assumes the language of justice and moderation, while it is practising iniquity and extravagance, and displays in the most captivating manner the charming pictures of candour, frankness, and sincerity, while it is rioting in rapine and insolence, this country will be the most miserable habitation in the world. Because we have no government, armed with power, capable of contending with human passions, unbridled by morality and religion. Avarice, ambition, revenge and licentiousness would break the strongest cords of our Constitution, as a whale goes through a net. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other. Oaths in this country are as yet universally considered as sacred obligations. That which you have taken, and so solemnly repeated on that venerable ground, is an ample pledge of your sincerity and devotion to your country and its government.

Letter to the Officers of the First Brigade of the Third Division of the Militia of Massachusetts, 11 October 1798, in Revolutionary Services and Civil Life of General William Hull (New York, 1848), pp 265-6. There are some differences in the version that appeared in The Works of John Adams (Boston, 1854), vol. 9, pp. 228-9, most notably the words “or gallantry” instead of “and licentiousness”.

(Bold mine)

We are presently in a war for the continuation of our society and I perceive attacks from every philosophical front. I put the idea in those terms as most individuals, I fear, don’t think of political correctness as a war against religious thought, or welfare as a war against the family. The pervasive push of sex, I believe, is a result of the 60’s crowd being now in power and is a battle for the destruction of society. Let’s apply another John Adams quote from the same page:

As to the history of the revolution, my ideas may be peculiar, perhaps singular. What do we mean by the Revolution? The war? That was no part of the revolution; it was only an effect and consequence of it. The revolution was in the minds of the people, and this was effected from 1760–1775, in the course of fifteen years, before a drop of blood was shed at Lexington.

Letter to Thomas Jefferson (24 August 1815), The Works of John Adams; he later expressed similar sentiments in a letter to Hezekiah Niles (13 February 1818)

Note where this early president understood the battle to be. We are fighting philosophically before we fight physically. The philosophers decided people came from apes in the late 1800’s before Hitler used that idea to base his attempted genocide against the Jews in the 1930’s. Our present battle has been waged since the early 70’s in my experience, and from the 60’s from what I have read and heard from commentators – let’s say David Horowitz for example.
The advent of “the pill” altered forever the approach people take towards sex. Prior to this time, any sexual activity had to be done with the understanding that there was a possible child to consider, and the woman was left with the largest concern of this subject requiring her to choose her man wisely. Consideration of sex was bound into the formation of family as the child would need nurturing and while the mother was adequately designed to care for the child, someone would have to be caring for her. The natural flow was the man would provide for the woman who would care for the home. Look at the reruns of “I Love Lucy” to see this concept in action.
Once contraceptive devices and “the pill” were adopted as successful deterrents to pregnancy, sex no longer had to be bound in marriage by consequence of a baby. It was “free.” As an aside, I remember reading somewhere on Catholic opposition to contraceptives and their observation that it took only 40 years to progress from “the pill” to abortion, to euthanasia. One cannot alter the natural design of God without death resulting.

Now that sex was not bound in marriage due to the removal of pregnancy considerations, other sexual perversions began to enter the consciousness. Homosexuality was shunned, and thought horrid when I was in grade school. The term mostly used was “queer.” I tried without luck to find the article describing the advertising firm utilized by homosexuals to propagate the term “gay” instead of “homosexual” and gain sympathy instead of derision in the wake of AIDES. The term “gay” has been utilized and propagandized since the early 80’s and if one notes the treatment of any who oppose their political agenda or say anything short of acceptance, the result is the experience of Dr. Laura:

When Cathy Renna, a spokesman for the Gay Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD), declared, “We’re going to go after the media outlets, the radio stations that run her, and get her off,” the media savants did not denounce Ms. Renna for advocating censorship and suppressing Dr. Laura’s right to express her opinion.

Homosexuality is a genetic dead end. New homosexuals must be made from the heterosexuality community. Man can live without air for about 2 minutes. Man can live without water for about 2 weeks. Man can live without food for about 3-4 weeks. Man can live without sex for only one generation -heterosexuals being the only productive ones. Under this concept I see the targeting of schools and training of kids during their formative years. There is a period of time where the child sees their opposite sex parent as the closest and hence the terms, “mother’s boy, daddy’s girl.” What better time to alter the normal sexual development than at the time when the child normally is interacting and adhering to the opposite sex. This means grade school, and note where the training materials are being utilized.

For those saying that I am “homophobic,” let me first tell you that there is no fear here. That is a poor use of the term and propaganda applied to anyone who dares broach the subject in an attempt to silence opponents. No, I am not phobic, I am truthful and Biblically oriented. You may take up the subject with God who says:

26For this reason God gave them over to degrading passions; for their women exchanged the natural function for that which is unnatural,27and in the same way also the men abandoned the natural function of the woman and burned in their desire toward one another, men with men committing indecent acts and receiving in their own persons the due penalty of their error.

28And just as they did not see fit to acknowledge God any longer, God gave them over to a depraved mind, to do those things which are not proper,29being filled with all unrighteousness, wickedness, greed, evil; full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, malice; they are gossips,30slanderers, haters of God, insolent, arrogant, boastful, inventors of evil, disobedient to parents,31without understanding, untrustworthy, unloving, unmerciful;32and although they know the ordinance of God, that those who practice such things are worthy of death, they not only do the same, but also give hearty approval to those who practice them.

Note the description of their mind – “depraved.” This is the origin of behavior. This is where I depart from Sean Hannity who says that whatever happens in the bedroom is none of his business because it has nothing to do with what happens in public. A depraved mind will not behave well in public. The origin of behaviors unfit for civil society will produce other behaviors not fit for civil society. G. Gordon Liddy mentioned on on the radio how the Catholic church decided that to get more priests in the 60’s, they would enlist homosexuals and as long as they abstained from that act, they would be fine. How many boys have been abused since then and the church marred by their behaviors? I can hear the screams, they are pedophiles, not homosexuals. Sorry, it wasn’t girls abused. If we heterosexuals are to own our degenerates who abuse children, you homosexuals can do the same – even when they wear the robes of the church, and shame the institution they represent.

Before anyone thinks I am picking on homosexuals and giving heterosexuals a pass, consider the following from 1 Corinthians 6:

9Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor homosexuals,10nor thieves, nor the covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers, will inherit the kingdom of God.11Such were some of you; but you were washed, but you were sanctified, but you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and in the Spirit of our God.

Flee from sexual immorality. All other sins a person commits are outside the body, but whoever sins sexually, sins against their own body.

There is only one area where sex is “free.” Hebrews 13:4

King James Version (KJV)

4 Marriage is honourable in all, and the bed undefiled: but whoremongers and adulterers God will judge.

Further fallout from the 60’s was the beginning of welfare. Remember the family formation where the father was to care for the mother who would care for the home? That is now out the window with the government providing income for the mothers who otherwise would not have any. Women did not have to consider a man as provider any longer. Sex was “free,” except that is has cost working people trillions of dollars. The government became the father. For those to whom I have said this and scoffed, let me ask a question: when you are a single mom and having problems with a kid, whom do you call?
This push to remove sex from family and fatherhood from the family is important beyond the spiritual realm. Remember the opening words from John Adams? I will give the short version here: Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other. Let’s consider the reverse of this for a moment: the way to remove the Constitution is to create an immoral and irreligious people. The way to destroy this nation is to alter the society from the family formed morality based on the Bible to an individually centered narcissism we see on display in the White House.

Know that I will consistently push for Biblical morality, for only in that will the nation be saved.