Post the Zimmerman trial, we got blessed with a barrage of the “n” word, and how it was all right for certain individuals to utilize it. There was a discussion of the changed ending of this word and how that was better than the original usage employed by Mark Twain. The radio talk personalities had moments in this discussion on its usage and how they (whoever was speaking) would never use that term.
I took the thoughts and placed them in my mental crock-pot for a few days until a certain image emerged for me. I remember back in early elementary school how we were presented with the idea that this nation was a melting pot for many cultures to come and contribute their best making our culture better. By the time I reached high school, this idea of melting pot was abandoned for the idea of multiculture where every culture was on equal footing, with none any better than any other. Dr. Sowell wrote an excellent book on this subject “Race and Culture” where he in detail nukes that concept. Just for a postage stamp of it, consider our number system. We use Arabic numbers instead of Roman numerals. Why? Because the Arabic number system is better. Period. They are not equal. The concept of multiculture is a lie presented for a political agenda.

Let’s consider, for a moment, food:

However, besides these common cultural symbols, many nations boast of “exotic” foods that are native to a region or a people. For example, Westernised nations may balk at eating a crisply fried Tarantula, but these giant spiders are a staple diet among Amazonian tribes. Or how about a plate of fresh bull’s testicles? A delicacy in Spain, it might well be considered unpalatable in other countries. Here’s a look at the “delicacies” that you will find on food plates around the world.

Note for that sentence – “A delicacy in Spain, it might well be considered unpalatable in other countries.”
That is the identity of this group – they will eat this, and no one else will. They are distinct in their culture according to what they eat. This identity according to palate is available in every country on the planet. Incidentally, our food characteristic is peanut butter. Interesting, I had not thought of being the only ones in the planet to eat this. Anyways, I am applying this same thought to the use of the “n” word.

The “n” word is utilized by the blacks in this country and forbidden to anyone else. If anyone else touches it, there is “H” to pay. I view this as one characteristic utilized to divide the blacks into their own culture which others may not enter. For the blacks, it is also the defining characteristic used, instead of character, in defiance of Martin Luther King’s wishes. If that sounds like too much of a stretch, consider this article on a teacher describing blacks in school. Actions described here further clan identification. Note the usage of music and exclusion of anyone who differs. The goal is to create a tribe. Usage of terms like nigg@ are markers of tribe identification.

Take a moment to consider the importance of tribe identification. There is a byline of a blog I frequent: The Smallest Minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities. – Ayn Rand The reason for tribal identification is simple: it’s easier to herd a family of dogs, than cats. Those who maintain individual thought are the hardest to control. Note the usage of Jews for Hitler. They were a tribe to which he could ascribe all the evils of the armistice from WW1. This produced an easy paradigm similar to the idea presented by Marx where there would be a struggle between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. Islam has the struggle of them against everyone else. Each of these ideologies pits the group against the group. The individual is not even considered unless in the context of assisting the group. The uselessness of the individual can be seen in their treatment of individuals who don’t follow the group lead.

The government is the only entity with the size to referee any disputes between large groups of individuals and is needed more for interventions if the population can be treated in that fashion. George, who has an argument with Fred is not a problem requiring intervention of government, presenting a situation that can even be solved by Joshua who is a good negotiator. At that level, government is not needed. An entire population deprived of *molasses* by an associated population is exactly a situation allowing government intervention. Therefore, finding the situation where the greatest number of people are affected is the greatest boon to growth and power of government. (As a side note, I will recognize that there are race baiters making a fortune for themselves by agitating the various populations.)

I have already mentioned two entities utilizing groups – socialists and muslims. Remember what I mentioned earlier about our Mr. Zero. He was born to a communist, raised a muslim, then mentored by a card carrying communist. Group identity is his background and forte. The actions of muslims are not a mystery to this man. For all the radio talk-heads speaking how incompetent this guy is, they are ignoring the fact that this individual grew up as a muslim and understands that mindset better than any detractors I have heard. Consider, for a moment, that what he has done and said are not from ignorance, but rather from malice. Consider that by destabilizing the middle east, the natural instincts of muslims would arise and take them closer to a caliphate – the ultimate goal of islam. Consider that the same mindset is at work here – using race, instead of muhammad as the stimulus for fomenting a particular group. If not to stimulate group identity action, why else would a national figure involve himself in a local individual affair most properly handled by local authorities?