When one looks at the present government, there is not much left to the imagination as there is very little they would not do.  Following the law would be a refreshing departure from their history.  Let’s see – running guns both in Mexico and in Lybia.  Having people killed, both in Mexico and Lybia.  Shake down of a foreign company for $20B to provide gifts to contributors.  Using the IRS to harass contributors to the opposing party.  This is just a hint of stuff happening.  With those in mind, we have the shooting of a rancher who made the statement ,”I won’t get out alive.”  This was presented as a threat.  I wonder if he simply recognized reality – that this regime would not let him live.  It is lawless, and at that point, only show of force remains.  I found this:

While taking up occupancy of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge, protesters reportedly gained access to sensitive information stored on the computers there, revealing sinister plans by the BLM to confiscate privately owned land with uranium reserves before auctioning it off to foreign interests that have donated to the Clinton Foundation, according a source who requested anonymity.

Read the rest.  What my be troubling is that the concept that this regime would operate in this fashion is not even in doubt.  Consider the recent death of a Supreme Court Justice:

While Scalia was pronounced dead “of natural causes”–or, alternatively, of a heart attack–no qualified official had actually examined his body, and there was no autopsy performed, apparently in deference to the wishes of his family.

John Poindexter, the owner of the ranch, provided more bait for speculation with an awkward description of how Scalia was found: “We discovered the judge in bed, a pillow over his head. His bed clothes were unwrinkled.”

Was a prominent conservative justice removed in the last year of this abomination of a presidency to tilt the rulings of the court?  On that note, realize that the court is not a set of justices finding out the law.  The radio announcement even noted that the court would be split 4:4 this last year.  Without detail, they announce 4 justices consistently vote liberal by that declaration.  There are 4 justices, in other words, who do not follow the stated wording of the Constitution which they are in place to enforce.

While typing this, apparently there was an open page on my browser which finally linked to a video.  I was greeted with the sentence, “Questions remain how rich countries will increase funding for poorer…” I clicked off before hearing the rest of the propaganda.  Let’s just note that the premise of the sentence is socialism.  Period.  When you take the money from those who work and give it to those who don’t, that’s socialism.  There is only one end to this kind of thinking – equal misery for most.  There are a few who live off the largess…  I think that’s why they (who live off others) profess that the economy is simply trading money to each other and not working which, in the real world, is what actually produces worth.