You used to have to know the weezle words and double intandras that were used to hide true intentions. Apparently, that’s not needed any more.
12 April, 2017
Comments Off on They aren’t even being shy any more
2 March, 2017
That term tends to evoke the idea of those things which make up all others. Technically, it is possible to split an element into the components of electron, neutron, and proton, but at that point, the element is lost. Elements have particular qualities and are known by their behavior interacting with similar and different other elements. Watching the behavior of an unknown element is the way to identify it. Tests can be done on an unknown substance and according to how it behaves in certain circumstances, the identity is determined. The same can be said for islam. Their behavior is not an aberration, it is an essential quality. Since the muslim is a known and celebrated lyer, (they even have a word for that behavior-taqiyya) it’s best to look at the behavior. Identity will be known. That is why I call them totalitarian tribal – a political ideology.
6 January, 2017
Comments Off on The Key Phrase to me:
Now we are faced with a pickle – do we follow sensibilities and continue to receive attacks, or learn a new language and achieve a sense of peace. I say a sense of peace as these trained individuals have been problems from the formation of this country. Look up the “shores of Tripoli” and note our relation to muslims has a long history. Their behavior has not changed. Our sensibilities have.
18 July, 2016
Comments Off on Someone in my ballpark
I have long espoused the concept that islam is just a totalitarian tribal ideology. I found another blogger with a similar viewpoint.
If you note the verses listed at the front of the article, it’s quite apparent that the present muslim attacks are simply acting according to their training. Driving a truck through a crowd, or beheading a foreigner, or stoning a woman who was raped are simply acts extruded from the philosophy of islam – the true expression, and not a fringe lunatic or madman. Imagine the clarity of purpose this country would have if the media treated coverage of islam the same as they treat guns. If that’s too much for you, how about treating islam the way the media treats Republicans? I know it’s too much to ask, but I would even take a true reporting of the acts and philosophy of islam. If a true reporting was presented, there would be a much different attitude. That’s why they don’t provide one. Philosophically, islam is so close to communism, the left is extremely comfortable with them and covers them the same way as Democrats. There’s another concept that is not presented.
As an aside, I would say a prayer for your local cops. They are wearing a target, not just from the muslims and black panthers, but also thugs who want to act under the cover of those murderous groups. We as a country need to have a rule of law. The cops are on the cutting edge of that interaction. Remove them and the picture gets ugly very quickly.
24 July, 2015
I have been working with a garden this year and have weeds. If there is a patch of dirt and something growing that was not planted – it’s a weed. They are the most prolific growing things out there. I think of Adam’s curse many times. On that note, just a thought, most consider creation done in the 6 days, but there were no weeds then. They were created later. Anyways, the weed seed initially puts its root into the ground, then starts to grow with the first task being that root, the second is creating new seeds. We have spiny weeds here in Texas, so it is very apparent when there are young ones growing their offspring. The weeds put down their roots, suck nutrients and water from the ground and inhibit other plants from growing in that area. Pulled weeds that aren’t completed removed tend to grow from the root left in the ground, so complete eradication of the root is required to get that particular plant from growing again. This can be in the form of digging around the root and pulling out the unit, or utilizing a chemical treatment to kill the while plant.
While pulling weeds, it has occurred to me how similar they are to the liberals and progressive philosophies. Their first task is to establish a root and start reproducing. Hence, targeting children who have no to very few defenses. I was in school prior to sexual education. There were these peculiar things called families. There was discipline and expectation of behavior in public. There were jokes about shotgun weddings because it was understood that certain behavior required certain consequences and subsequent behavior. Children were able to expect certain things from adults and in return adults had certain expectations of the children. Was it ideal in all cases? Of course not. That argument is thrown to try and diffuse the observation that family life was much better then. The statistics bear me out. To paraphrase Thomas Sowell, the only reason to teach sexual education for twelve years is not to impart knowledge. It is to change the training of the parents. The idea was to start young, when defenses were nonexistent or minimal and keep chanting the refrain. Our society shows the weeds that have grown from this seed. Planned Parenthood is just the logical extension of the line of reasoning starting with sex having no consequences.
A similar thought can be applied to each philosophy espoused by the left or liberals or progressives, or socialists. Pick your title, it works as there are only shades of difference between them. Speech codes are on campuses now, not to “protect” the students, but rather to remove any concept contrary to what is being presented. Compare the reaction of a terrorist going to Columbia to the reception given Ann Coulter. (By the way, I found the links by using a search engine and typing in “terrorist speaking at Columbia” and “shouted down ann coulter campus.” The links were numerous.) Note that the one who has espoused destruction of a country, threatening nuclear attack is treated with dinner compared to one who has spoken truth. I know Ann can be a bit abrasive at times, but she has never advocated annihilation of an entire people. Note the treatment between the two. The academic institutions have clearly chosen a side, and it is the one of violence and destruction. Just like weeds, anything decent is starved of nutrients and space.
What can one do? When planting a garden, I had to look for the seedlings and pull weeds that were growing around them. I kept this up until the plant was big enough to cover the foot path I had left. Once the plant was big enough, my weeding activity lessened. The young “minds full of mush” as Rush Limbaugh describes them, need to have the weeds removed from their immediate vicinity to allow growth until a time when they are big enough to cover that territory. In other words, it takes parents dedicated to their childrens’ growth. Hence the attack on the family in general and fathers and marriage in particular. Hang tough, we truly are in a war. It’s not a shooting war, its one in the culture fought by those trying to control the narrative – the concepts by which the culture behaves. We can engage it by blocking weed growth – turning off the TV and not patronizing movies, and instructing the young in proper etiquette, and interaction with each other. Real history instruction would also be helpful. When the kids bring home propaganda, point it out as such. It wasn’t 5 years after the impeachment, that kidinbox brought home a textbook noting that the Republicans were against the president. Nothing about obstruction of justice or purgery. I got to instruct the real history. That is the activity of which I am speaking. The philosophical weeds can only be abated if we each keep working in that space.
15 January, 2015
Comments Off on Sleeper Cell in the WH?
19 September, 2014
Siblinginbox sent the following:
The Constitution has experienced somewhat of a resurgence in the last several years, perhaps because of the polarization of political opinions in the United States as well as attempts by presidents from both parties attempts consume more power for the executive branch. The revelations about National Security Agency, efforts to censor speech, expand gun control laws are just the tip of the iceberg of attempts to trample the rights guaranteed by the Bill of Rights.
In his presidential proclamation marking Constitution Day, President Barack Obama offered some insight into how he views the Bill of Rights. “Our Constitution reflects the values we cherish as a people and the ideals we strive for as a society,” Obama said in the release. “It secures the privileges we enjoy as citizens, but also demands participation, responsibility, and service to our country and to one another.”
Notice that zero removed the proper name of this that was even ensconced in the title. Take a moment to consider the attack he just perpetrated. By using that word, zero is trying to remove the position of God in our country.
What is a right? It is that given by God enjoyed by the individual and not under subjection by the state. That’s why our founders used the big ideas of “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.” Note that these are each characteristics for the individual and not subject to the labors of another. (On that note, realize that health care cannot be a right as it is totally dependent upon the labor of another.) That which is truly a right is what gets defended, even when we disagree totally with the response the other individual has in a situation. From this comes the statement: “I don’t agree with what you say, but will defend to the death your right to say it.” That is application of a right. A privilege is the key presented to me as an employee of the business. I now have the privilege to enter the building at will as I have access. The authorities may remove that privilege and I lose my key and the abilities given thereby. This is the level at which zero presents our Constitution. Not as a recognition of God given rights which are to be defended against all enemies foreign or domestic, but rather a privilege which can be doled out by those in authority to underlings. Hear the socialism in this voice: “demands participation, responsibility, and service to our country and to one another.” Only Marxism demands that – from each according to his ability to each according to his need. The needy are in the best position in this scenario, therefore, every country under this mindset suffers.