Society


Lone Ranger and Superman and Batman shows of years gone by (ignore the new ones) each tried to establish the law as the ultimate desire of a civilized society.  Everyone was equal in the eyes of the law and justice would be done.  That was then.  When OJ walked, and no charges have been filed against Hildabeast, John Kerry was not charged with treason and lying to congress and Jane Fonda was not charged with treason, it is readily apparent that justice isn’t at work in this country any more.  Also, consider other stories like the man who slammed on his brakes, tried to lecture the young teen – now has to file for life as a sex offender.   (note the first comment)  It’s becoming readily apparent that true justice isn’t being done.  The desire for “civilized” society will only be met if the government appropriately does its job – which it has spectacularly not been doing.  The result is that this society will revert to where we were before the push for “justice”.  Read here.   (Not for the squeamish of imagination)

Advertisements

1.)A Marines Letter To The NFL

I would say read it and turn off the sound.  The music was annoying.  The sentiments expressed were perfect.

2.)Just for fun.

3.) Imagine a government bureaucracy deciding to look into the inventory of your house and all they have to do is check the purchase spread sheet.  Imagine that every transaction you do is monitored by the government.  Neighborhood kid mows the lawn – monitored.  Buy something at a garage sale – monitored.  From that level, how long until monitored becomes controlled?  War on money.  An excerpt:

The real aim of the war on cash however was outlined in a Wall Street Journal OpEd by Harvard economist and former chief economist at the IMF, Kenneth Rogoff. Rogoff argues that there should be a drastic reduction in the Federal Reserve’s issuance of cash. He calls for all bills above the $10 bill to be removed from circulation, thereby forcing people and businesses to depend on digital or electronic payments solely. He repeats the bogus mantra that his plan would reduce money-laundering, thereby reduce crime while at the same time exposing tax cheats.

However the hidden agenda in this War on Cash is confiscation of our money in the next, inevitable banking crisis, whether in the EU member countries, the United States or developing countries like India.
https://journal-neo.org/2017/08/21/a-sinister-war-on-our-right-to-hold-cash/

4.) I note the interesting phrase so ignored, “…or anything that would at least indicate the belief that minorities can do for themselves with a bit of help.”  How racist is it to say that these people can’t do anything for themselves?  Isn’t that the unspoken line?  There are no slaves on this side of the Atlantic, unless you consider working people vs the IRS.  There are actual slaves on the other side though.  How many essays have been done on them?  There are no slaves here, or any reason for reparations.  If one considers the amount of welfare transferred from the working whites to the blacks, all has been paid and then some.  Since conditions are more deplorable than when it was started in the ’60’s, I want a refund and removal of this drain on my income.  I guess with that stated, the blacks could claim being unfairly treated if they held jobs and had income removed from them like the rest of us.  For those working blacks, kudos for using your talents in the marketplace and enduring cries of “uncle tom, ect.”  When I was in grade school, melting pot was taught.  This was the concept that people all over the world came here with their individual talents, which when used, benefited the rest of society.  That quieted for a few years, then multiculturalism emerged which touted everything but the American culture.  That has been rammed down children’s throats since then.  It’s past time to return to the time of melting pot and expectation that a person was expected to work and contribute their talents to themselves, their families, and ultimately then society.

There is a reason I don’t answer questions from the census beyond the number of people in the house.  The more information an entity has, the better placed they are to elicit stimuli of control.  That is not conjecture, that is fact and utilized by parents constantly.  Consider telling your kids to do “x” and you go into the next room and listen.  The sounds heard allow the appropriate “reminder” at which point the kids believe you have eyes floating in the room.  It’s just you know their behavior and when to respond in such a fashion.  Allowing a governmental or business entity personal information is allowing similar treatment from them.

I say it’s time to stop using anything Google.  Find an alternative.  I know they’re easy to utilize.  That’s the hook.  When you go fishing, you provide the bait to catch whatever decides to grab the hook.  Stop grabbing their hook.

I work with diabetics providing testing and insulin as needed. One patient had a new glucometer which included a voice. The meter was rather polite. It said hello, the strip was placed in the unit, instructed to add blood, and reported the result. All this was reasonable, especially for those with poor eyesight. The intriguing part was the moment when the strip was removed from the machine to be disposed. The machine, at this point, would wish the user a “nice day.” That is a nice sentiment, but received from a machine programmed to say the same thing at the point of stimulus made me think how hollow the sentiment actually was – in that context. Receiving that sentiment from a person would be much more pleasurable as the person could choose how to address the ending of the contact and thus provide an individual thought for the situation. The repeated phrase would still have some additional value as the provider has the option of choosing which sentiment to say. The machine has no choice and as such becomes a vehicle for a more empty feeling set of sounds.
BTW, I received a call from a car company from which I had purchased a tire. It was a computer asking for an analysis of my experience there. I hung up as the usage of the computer shows they really didn’t want to know. Maybe I could set up my cell phone to call in a reply to their computer…that’s an interesting thought.

There is only one possible way to make molecules inhabit the same space. That is fusion. The nuclei of both atoms are forced together and a new element forms. The resulting expression of energy is rather destructive to the surrounding area, but I note this as the only manner of atoms occupying the same space. That said, to the driver on the access road, please note that when the road comes up to an intersection having a sign declaring YIELD, I may follow the rules of the road and YIELD to the traffic having the right-of-way. I know that might be an odd concept, but consider that when I YIELD, you cannot occupy the same space as me unless fusion takes place. Since it didn’t, I was left with the decision to move out of traffic and examine the result of our lack of fusion – the new scratches in the paint of the bumper. It is also bad form to pull over like you are being honorable and when I exit the vehicle, drive away. I can only wonder if karma does exist. Consider that next time you approach the intersection with a YIELD sign present.

Many decades ago Many moons ago, my aunt’s church was beginning service.  This was done in the usual fashion as previous services had, with the exception that, (as the pastor later stated) the congregation seemed worshipful that morning.  The usual hum of chatter emanating from the pews seemed subdued and the greater portion of the congregation appeared bowed in a prayer position.  There had been no announcements, no incidents to stimulate such a somber mood, and yet this congregation of 150 members all seemed to be in one accord in their worship and apparent prayer.  The pastor approached the lectern and cheerfully announced the start of the service.  I’m sure a camera was desired at this point as 150 congregants sat upright each wearing a pair of slinky glasses.

I have mentioned many times the MSP and generally referred to the news media that is particularly socialist in their approach.  Remember the reports on the economy 4 years ago?  With unemployment at about 4%?  Compare that to the present reports of the economy with unemployment officially at about 8.5%, but only because of fuzzy math and elimination of jobs to reduce the percentage.  I have been instructed how much more widespread this phenomenon is.  There is a book out there be Ben Shapiro containing the following gem: “I asked Goldberg why there didn’t seem to be any real debate about politics on television anymore – why everyone simply assumed that the far-left position was correct, and that the only real question was whether that position was practical… But if we’ve begun to move beyond such debates, it’s due in large part to the success of writers like Goldberg, who have made the leftist position so palatable to a broad swath of Americans simply by presenting likable characters who promote liberal politics as tautologies.”      (pg 129)

It now makes more sense why so many shows didn’t appeal to my sensibilities.

Next Page »